Answer:
abstract vs concrete
Explanation:
Intuitive thinking refers to the use of abstract thinking and a more emotional based feelings approach to make conclusions. Most conclusions of intuitive thinking are based on "gut feelings". An example of intuitive thinking is drawing the conclusion that a person is a certain way based on the way their face looks. Conclusions are drawn not based on any factual evidence of their behaviour.
Logical thinking relies on hard evidence and facts. Logical thinkers rely on rules and processes to maneuver the situations presented to them and use these in their problem solving methods. An example of logical thinking that any shape with four equal sides is called a square. There is no need for analysis once these facts are established.
Central Europe !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
Goals, methods, and styles of inquiry.
Explanation:
By establishing a comparison between the cultural directions that both law and psychology take, it is easier to figure out the reasons why, on some occasions, psychology and law have not been able to work together, whereas in some others, have been very productive in collaborating. These cultural differences take place because of their different goals, methods, and styles of inquiry.
Answer:
whats the answer? I can't see them
Fallingwater = Frank Lloyd Wright used Nature and Japenese influences to build the house partly over a natural waterfall on Bear Run in rural Pennsylvania.
