Answer:
I think options A is correct
Answer:
The two social classes of ancient Rome were made up of patricians and plebeians.
Explanation:
Patricians were the upper class of Ancient Rome. They claimed to be descendants of the families who founded Rome or who settled there shortly after it was founded. As a consequence of their antiquity in the Roman nation, as well as their status of being original from Rome and not from conquered or annexed peoples, the Patricians originally held most of the political and economic power in Ancient Rome. Thus, they practically controlled to their pleasure the decisions of the Senate, and they handled the appointments of the consuls and other positions of power. This was so until the outbreak of the Patrician-Plebeian War, which ended up granting equality to both social classes through Lex Hortensia in 287 BC.
For their part, the Plebeians were Roman citizens who had civil rights under Roman law, but who had no political power or strategic economic importance. Some of them owned land, inherited from their ancestors, but had no greater wealth than some businesses. They were the lowest free class in Ancient Rome, only above slaves and free non-citizens.
The rulers of Italy before the Romans were the "Etruscans", although it should be noted that the Etruscan dominance of the region was not even close to the Romans' in terms of power and political nature.
Answer:
As a Christian I do believe that people should have religious freedom, and if necessary it is worth to protest to help support our religious freedom. As well as article 18: Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. Which means if someone says we don't have the right we can challenge them and quote article 18 as well as know the other articles in case of other things.
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
The court ruled to remove protection from dangerous
speeches. Charles Schenck was an
anti-war activist who spoke out against the war and was arrested for espionage. It is believe that he was threatening the war
effort with his speeches and was charged as a result.
