My position on the use of presidential pardon authority is of favourability; because this was granted by the Constitution which represents the Americans desires and philosophy of how the govern should act for the citizens and states interests and dreams.
  
Pardons tend to be controversial because as they overlay justice decisions the President can use the pardon and offer it for a person in the purpose of fulfilling, or attend his own interest or causes. Taking advantage of pardon for personal benefits.
  
One actual example of a president’s use of his pardon authority was the pardon granted for Former President Richard Nixon by President Gerald Ford on September 8, 1974 regarding any crimes he could have done in Watergate Scandal.
The pardon legally relates to punishment effects for a crime (if it is offered before a conviction it prevents the penalties and disabilities and if it is after a conviction it removes them).  
The emotional issues that those most personally affected by the original crime may have toward the granting of a pardon can be vary.  
In the case of Nixon critics claimed the pardon to be a “corrupt bargain” and later this seems to be the cause of peoples rejection of Ford and reason of the President losing the elections of 1976. While for Nixon was a great relive and an import act this pardon Ford gave him.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Nowadays, North Korea is a country ruled by an autocratic ruler (that is to say, a kind of government where one person has all the power, in this case, a dictator) in a one-party system (the Workers´ Party of Korea), in what is called the Kim Dynasty (nowadays Kim Jung Un is the Chairman and absolute ruler of the country). The Kim Dynasty has ruled the country since 1948.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
High definition television also called advanced television because of the technological innovations used in its manufacturing. It has improved the quality of picture films and ensured high-quality sound and there termed as the next generation of television. The government planned to set for one standard because a new product in the market whose standard is not set could result in inferior quality. Secondly, one standard allows the states to work together and expand their commercial ties.