Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation of the internal rate of return is shown below:
Given that
The expected cash inlfows would be $9,400 for four years each
Rate of return is 7%
The Initial investment is $30,455
Based on the above information
The net present value is
= $9,400 × PVIFA factor for 7% at 4 years - $30,455
= $9,400 × 3.3872 - $30,455
= $31,840 - $30,455
= $1,385
Now the present value factor is
= $30,455 ÷ $9,400
= 3.2399
Now based on the factor table, the rate should be 9% for four years
b. Yes depend upon the internal rate of return, the park co should make the investment
FIEJFIE GIEDEIJF EKEE DE E FIR FIE FID FIE DIW AODNF F
Answer:
the equilibrium price but not above or below the equilibrium price.
Explanation:
At equilibrium price, quantity demanded equals quantity supplied. At this point, buyers are able to buy all they want to buy and sellers are able to sell all they want
Above equilibrium price, there would be a surplus. the quantity supplied would exceed the quantity demanded. Sellers would not be able to sell all they want in this case
Below the equilibrium price, there would be a shortage. the quantity demanded would exceed the quantity supplied. buyers would not be able to buy all they want
Answer:
a. The total employment compensations for the two employees are the same
Explanation:
Employee compensation refers to payment made to employees by an organization in consideration for the services rendered.
Employee compensation can be in cash form such as salary and wages, perquisites, allowances, incentives, commission, etc.
In the given case,
<u>Compensation for Employee A</u>:
= Gross Pay + Employee benefits - Job expenses
= $57200 + 5300 - 800
= $ 61,700
Similarly,
Compensation for Employee B:
= Gross Pay + Employee benefits - Job expenses
= $56,900 + $6200 - $ 1400
= $61,700
Thus, employment compensation for both A and B are the same.
Answer:
B. will be guilty of taking a secret profit if he does not disclose to the landlord
Explanation:
Acceptance of any gifts or payments in return for fixing up a contract and or acting as a middleman in negotiating a deal constitutes a bribe or a kickback.
In the given case, the carpet seller is willing to give project manager, super bowl tickets in return for facilitating the large order from the landlord.
Here, the landlord is not aware of this scheme and if the property manager accepts such gifts without informing the first party i.e the landlord, would amount to making secret profits.
Thus, in compliance with right ethical practices, it is the duty of the project manager to inform the landlord of the gift and it's nature before accepting any of those.
