The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer:
The correct answer for:U.S. slavery continued for 150 years. Black Africans were kidnapped from their own lands and shipped to the New World on the trans-Atlantic journey called the Middle Passage. Slave codes declared that the child of a slave was a slave, Is: Slave children. "Children of the plantation".
Explanation:
The slave code of the united states specified that the children of slaves would follow the condition of the mother so if the mother was a slave the children were going to inherit her slave condition. However, if the save offspring had a free mother the children were going to be a free child even though those were pretty rare cases. In most of the cases, the slave mother would have a few months to take care of the children, nevertheless, after that period, they were required to go back to their slave labors. They would carry the babies while they performed their duties.
It is to deliver appropriately qualified civilian men for the induction into the Armed Forces of the US as authorized by Congress.
Las respuestas correctas son las siguientes.
¿Es la cultura algo estático o algo dinámico?
Definitivamente, la cultura es algo dinámico. La cultura se transforma todo el tiempo porque la gente cambia y adopta nuevas formas de comportamiento en una sociedad, a pesar de que las tradiciones se respetan.
¿Cómo aportan estas definiciones de cultura a comprender, reproducir y/o transformar la realidad existente?
En que cada generación desarrolla sus propias características en base a su sistema de creencias. Una generación tiene una forma de ser y pensar distinta, a la siguiente generación: de abuelos, a padres, a hijos. De ahí que cada una de ellas transforma la realidad social de manera distinta e implanta su propia forma de ser y de pensar.
¿Encontraste una definición de cultura semejante a la que escribiste en la actividad de inicio?
En realidad, todas son muy parecidas, y mantienen características constantes como el lenguaje, la historia, las tradiciones, la manera, de pensar y la religión, entre otras tantas.
Answer:
is the aggregate of all national markets, seen as linked through mutual economic and trade relations. New trends in trade relations, both between socialist states and between states with differing socioeconomic systems, can now develop and expand within the overall world economy
