Answer:
Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.
Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.
Answer:
"It is a fair summary of constitutional history that the landmarks of our liberties have ... the center of one of many national civil liberties disputes in the late 20th century. ... For example, the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the ... Government, then, cannot interfere in an individual's freedom of worship.
Explanation:
Answer:
E. XYZID
Explanation:
Looked it up on the internet
Answer:
Option A (Prepare taxes for compensation) is the correct choice.
Explanation:
In the above question, options are not given. Please find the attachment of the full question.
- A PTIN (preparer tax identification number) would be an inland revenue department Service identifier that was introduced in 1999 requiring all compensated federal income tax returns appraisers to registered with either the legislative branch as well as to receive a special code from 2010.
- Here because the tax identifying number or code of George's Preparer has indeed been withdrawn and so he can't take responsibility for taxation for reimbursement.
The remaining three options do not apply to a particular instance. So option A seems to be the right one.
