41/5 is actually 8.2. So to find how much tax there is you multiply .082 times 63.78. The tax is $5.22. But to get all of it, you have to add it to the original. 5.23+63.78=69.00. So the tax is $5.23, but the cost with tax is $69.
Answer:
A. cv = $628998.51
B. cv = $638180.86
Explanation:
Fv = iv * (1 + r)^n
Where fv = final value
Iv = initial value. = 630,000
r = rate = 4.5%
n = time of maturity = 4/12 = 0.3333
So therefore:
Fv = 630000(1 +.045)^0.3333
Fv = $639310.75
a. If rate is reduced to 5%
Current market value = c.f.
Since rise or drop in rate would affect the new value of product if you are to sell
So:
639310.75 = cv( 1 + r )^0.3333
cv = 639310.75 / (1.05)^0.3333
cv = 628998.51
b. If rate reduces to 4.25%
Solving it the same way as (a)
639310.75 = cv* ( 1 + 0.0425 ) ^0.3333
cv = $638180.86
Answer:
True, but it rarely works well.
Explanation:
The most recent and largest failure by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has just happened in Argentina, where the government received over $50 billion in loans that it is unable to pay. The IMF has never been successful in any country where it has helped to develop a new economic plan. Ironically, some Nobel prize winners (including Joseph Stiglitz) tell countries to do exactly the opposite to what the IMF tells them to do, and that has worked much better.
On the other hand, the World Bank has had some limited success in South American countries like Bolivia and Uruguay, specially with helping to develop new industries or expand existing ones. In Bolivia it helped to develop a new agricultural plan that improved the economy of the Santa Cruz region a lot, and it is one of its major economic successes. In Uruguay it financed new projects related to paper businesses that increased the nations GDP by almost 10%.
This is the reason why the IMF has such a bad rep while the World Bank is still seen as a valid option for financing large investment projects.
Buying new technology direct correlation with an increase in productivity for a company
Answer: Increase your confidence through practice by coaching Mexican sales-reps and then seeking feedback on your approach.
Explanation:
Based on the above scenario, to
continuing developing cross-cultural skills in delivering performance feedback, I would need to deliver performance feedback to the sales representatives in a written format.
Another helpful method will be to differentiate between what I will say and how to say it and also determine whether I delivered the feedback with enough deference and humility. This will be needed to convey my message across well.
The least helpful method will be the increase in confidence through practice by coaching the Mexican sales representatives and then seeking the feedback on your approach. Coaching them isn't the way forward.
