1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uranmaximum [27]
2 years ago
11

Jason is a correctional officer who will be testifying at an inmate's parole hearing. The inmate's family lives in the same neig

hborhood as Jason, and brings over some cookies while Jason is home and tells him they hope Jason will make the right decision at the hearing. Jason decides not to take the cookies from the family himself, and instead asks his wife to accept the cookies.
A.Ethical
B.Unethical
C.Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Law
1 answer:
tia_tia [17]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

unethical

1 what if the cookies where spiked. then what would he do?

2 if the cookies had something she was allergic to and they didn't ask

3 maybe their familie was being nice but i think the parole officer didn't trust them so led the exception to his wife to make sure

Explanation:

You might be interested in
You think to escape my question!!!!!
Arisa [49]

have a nice day haha

5 0
2 years ago
Hiii everyone how are you​
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Good and how about you :))

5 0
3 years ago
5) What is the punishment for Kidnapping?
lara [203]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

d) I believe First Degree Felony

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following describes stare decisis
vesna_86 [32]
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. ... Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions. Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided."
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where in the constitution are judicial nominations described?
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

Judicial nominations are described in<u> Article II, Section II.</u>

Explanation:

<u>Article II, Section II, also known as the Appointments Clause of the Constitution</u>, gives the President the authority to nominate public officials, including justices of the Supreme Court. However, before the nominee can become a justice, he or she must be rejected or confirmed by the Senate.

In the judicial nominations, then, both the Executive branch and the Legislative branch have a role. This Clause is an example of how the Checks and Balance system works; in this system, each branch of the government oversee, limit and control the other so that no branch abuse from its powers.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happens when children are born in prison and no one can take care of them
    6·2 answers
  • Theory should be tested against___ to measure its accuracy and value
    11·1 answer
  • Assume instead that, upon witnessing the lovers in each other's arms, Jill departs from the home and drives around in her car fo
    6·1 answer
  • Do you watch the news? Do you think the media tells the truth? Why is the news mostly negative?
    13·2 answers
  • Sanyukt Vakya kitne Prakar ke Hote Hain​
    13·1 answer
  • 5. (56) What is written on a death certificate in the C.O.D. can't be identified?​
    7·1 answer
  • Brown just vented what do I do?
    9·1 answer
  • This road sign means
    7·2 answers
  • Who is the father of nation in bangladesh
    9·1 answer
  • A fragment of glass was found on the back of a suspect’s sweatshirt. At the crime scene, there was a window that was broken. Wha
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!