Answer:
Yes, the spin off was successful.
With the major segments of fast food being sandwich chains, pizza chains, family restaurants, dinner houses, chicken chains, and more each Yum restaurant needed to be placed into their own niche. They also started using multi-branding and putting the brands in the same building. This allowed one location to draw in a more diverse crowd of consumers while offering them more variety and covering the other brands weak points.
Reason for their success.
PepsiCo, when spinning off these fast food chains, openly stated “restaurants weren't our schtick.” I.e the company presented themselves themselves to media that restaurants isn't focus. Before the spin off KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell often acted as their own entities and competed with each other resulting in lowered sales for all of the restaurants. With the spin off of Tricon the restaurants were unified with the sharing of many resources and using their collective clout, as one of the top five brands, to get better deals on ingredients all the restaurants share. Their concentrated focus allows them to be greatly effective in entering new markets such as Asia
The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:
<span>a) Summit
b) Appogee
c) Peak
d) Maximoid
</span>
I believe the correct answer is option D. The point on the business cycle where real GDP reaches its highest level is known as the Maximoid. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
B characteristics of the children etc
Answer:
$4.50
Explanation:
The sunk cost is the cost that has been incurred and is unrecoverable in the process of taking a financing decision.
If the cost of a coffee cup from a local gas station cost $5.00 and the cost of refill is $0.50, the coffee is the actual element needed and from the refill, it can be estimated that it costs $0.50.
Hence the sunk or unrecoverable cost is the difference between the coffee cup and the refill cost
= $5.00 - $0.50
= $4.50
Answer: Alternative 3 will be selected.
Explanation:
The system that should be selected is the alternative that is better than the other alternatives by being higher than MARR if selected.
First compare A1 to A0
The rate of return here is 18% which is higher than the MARR of 15% so Alternative 1 should be chosen over A0 which is to do nothing.
Compare A1 to A2
If A2 is chosen over A1, the incremental return is 10% which is less than the MARR of 15% so A2 should not be chosen over A1. A1 should instead be chosen over A2.
Compare A1 to A3
If A3 is chosen over A1 then the incremental return would be 18%. This is higher than the MARR of 15% so Alternative 3 should be chosen over Alternative 1.
Alternative 3 should be chosen over A1 which should be chosen over A2 and A0.
A3 will therefore be selected.
