All categories

3 years ago

SDJ, Inc., has net working capital of $2,060, current liabilities of $5,550, and inventory of $1,250.

Business

1 answer:

alexandr1967 [171]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Current ratio = 1.37 times

Quick Ratio = 1.15 times

Explanation:

The current ratio and quick ratios both are measures to assess the liquidity position of businesses. These are useful indicators of how well the business is equipped to meet its current obligations using its liquid assets.

To calculate these ratios, we must first determine the value of current assets. We are given the value of net working capital. The net working capital is the difference between the current assets and the current liabilities.

Net Working capital = Current assets - Current Liabilities

2060 = Current Assets - 5550

2060 + 5550 = Current Assets

Current assets = $7610

Requirement 1.

The current ratio is calculated as follows,

Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities

Current ratio = 7610 / 5550

Current Ratio = 1.3711 rounded off to 1.37 times

Requirement 2.

The quick ratio is calculated as follows,

Quick Ratio = (Current Assets - Inventories) / Current Liabilities

Quick Ratio = (7610 - 1250) / 5550

Quick Ratio = 1.1459 rounded off to 1.15 times

You might be interested in

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines a healthy sleep duration

laiz [17]

a. The point estimate of the married people that sleep well is = 0.6299. The confidence interval for the mean hours of sleep for those that have never been married but report good sleep is 0.6186, 0.6412

b. The point estimate of the number of hours for people that have never been married = 7.2257

95% confidence interval for the mean number of hours of sleep for those who have never been married = 7.2065, 7.2447

c. the estimated number of sleep for those that have never been married = 7.729 hours

a. The point estimate

$P=\frac{Xp}{n}$

$Xp = successes\\n = sample size\\$

Those who have never been married n = 7044

Xp = those who sleep for 7 hours at least

To get Xp, the excel function

Countif(range, criteria)

Countif(A:A, >=7)

This gives Xp = 4437

Point estimate =

$\frac{4477}{7044}$

= 0.6299

The point estimate of the married people that sleep well is = 0.6299

At 95% interval of confidence,

α = 1-0.95 = 0.05

α/2 = 0.05/2 = 0.025

Z0.025 = 1.96 ( Use the standard probability normal table)

Margin of Error

= $M.E = 1.96\sqrt \frac{0.6299(1-0.6299)}{7044} \\\\= 1.96\sqrt{0.000033} \\\\1.96*0.0057$

= 0.0113

The 95% confidence interval

= 0.6299 - 0.0113 , 0.6299 + 0.0113

= 0.6186, 0.6412

The confidence interval for the mean hours of sleep for those that have never been married is 0.6186, 0.6412

b. Sample mean

x = ∑x/n

x = number of sleep of the never been married

Mean is calculated using excel function

Average(range)

Average(a:a)

This gives the sample mean = 7.2257

The point estimate of the number of hours for people that have never been married = 7.2257

Standard deviation using excel =

Stdev(A:A) = 0.8211

$Margin of error =1.96*\frac{0.8211}{\sqrt{7044} }$

= 0.0192

The confidence interval =

= 7.2257-0.0192, 7.2257+0.0192

= 7.2065, 7.2447

95% confidence interval for the mean number of hours of sleep for those who have never been married = 7.2065, 7.2447

c. From the available data, the mean number of sleep per day that is gotten from the 4437 people that are unmarried and sleep healthily for at least 7 hours = 34295.1

Mean = 34295.1/4437

= 7.729

the estimated number of sleep for those that have never been married = 7.729 hours

6 0

3 years ago

Thornton, Inc., had taxable income of $128,267 for the year. The company's marginal tax rate was 35 percent and its average tax

valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

$30784.08

Explanation:

Taxable income can be refer to as the amount of income used to calculate how much tax an organisation owes to the government in a particular tax year.

Thornton Inc. had taxable income of $128,267 for the year

The company's marginal tax rate is 35 percent

The company's average tax rate is 24 percent

To know how much did the company have to pay in taxes for the year, we multiply the Taxable income by the Company Average tax rate for the year.

=$128,267 * 24%

=$128,267 * 0.24

=$30784.08

Thornton Inc will pay $30784.08 for the year.

8 0

3 years ago

svlad2 [7]

Answer:

Allocative efficiency is about distributing or allocating resources in the best possible manner. E.g. in order to fight the current pandemic, more resources ($) is allocated to different health care institutions.

Productive efficiency is about how a company or a person uses the resources that it has in order to produce the greatest amount of benefits at the lowest possible cost. E.g. in a hospital, if a doctor is able to treat 15 patients per day, his/her productive efficiency will be higher than another doctor that only treats 10 patients per day.

3 0

3 years ago

We say that the economy as a whole is in macroeconomic equilibrium if:

Serga [27]

For the economy as a whole, macroeconomic equilibrium if the total spending, or aggregate expenditure, equals total production, or GDP: Aggregate Expenditure = GDP.

Macroeconomic equilibrium happens when the quantity of real GDP demanded equals the amount of actual GDP provided at the point of intersection of the ad curve and the AS curve. If the amount of actual GDP provided exceeds the amount demanded, inventories pile up in order that corporations will reduce production and expenses.

Macroeconomic equilibrium is a situation within the economy in which the amount of combination called for equals the quantity of aggregate supply. If there are changes in both aggregate call for or mixture deliver, you can additionally see a trade-in rate, unemployment, and inflation.

The amount of output furnished may be extra than the mixture demand. charges will begin to fall to dispose of the surplus output. As fees fall, the amount of combination demand will increase and the economy returns to equilibrium.

Learn more about macroeconomic equilibrium here: brainly.com/question/1971734

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

When Tesla first launched their electric vehicles in the United States, they deviated from the norm in the automobile industry a

Damm [24]

Answer:

The choice of Tesla is known as Forward Integration.

According to the principles of Transaction Cost Economics, this is a good decision.

Explanation:

Companies sometimes take over the operations/businesses that deal with the distribution and supply of their products and or services. This move is known as forward integration.

Traditionally, companies focus on production then bring in middle-men such as Franchise owners, wholesales, dealers, and retailers to distribute their merhandise to the end user. Whilst there are associated benefits with this model, it's been found that the interests of the middle men also generate considerable costs.

In order to competitive advantage, companies are modifying their business models such that end users can deal directly with them thus reducing the final price of their goods and or services making them more accessible and easier to purchase for the consumers.

Transaction Cost Economics refers to the various ways in which an organisation can be set up in order to manage or control the costs associated with its transactions. The goal of transaction cost economics is to reduce overall costs in order to optimize profits, stay competitive and maintain growth by managing and modifying organisational structures and business models.

The most optimized organisational structure/business model is that which is able to attain the highest efficiency possible by operating at the lowest cost possible.

Good or Bad Decision

The market for motor vehicles is an oligopoly.

Therefore, price is an important factor to consider. As a more recent entrant into that space, this is very crucial for Tesla.

Tesla is not only entering into a market dominated by giants, but is also tryin to modify the way people know to drive cars (at least in most parts of the world). Therefore, it is a great move that it is going with a Price Penetration Strategy. Thus by cutting off the Franchise-Oriented dealerships and selling directly, Tesla is able to retain control over the price of it's vehicles.

The whole essence of reducing it's costs is so that it is able to make its products available to the consumers as an alternative to fossile fuel powered vehicles at the lowest cost possible. Despite it's best efforts, there are still petrol powered cars that are at least $10,000 cheaper that what Tesla is offering.

Besides price, one major factor that influences the choice to go with hybrid or 100% of electric cars is that they are clean and very environmental friendly.

Cheers!

5 0

3 years ago