Answer:
The answer is price, product, and advertising.
Explanation:
The market situation of a monopolistic competitor is made more complex than our simple revenue-and-costs graphs would suggest, because the firm in reality juggles three decisions: price, product, and advertising.
Answer:
- 1. <em>For the amount to double</em>: <u>9.37 years</u>
- 2. <em>For the amount to triple</em>: <u>14.85 years</u>
Explanation:
The equation for continuosly compounded interest is:
Where:
- P is the amount that you invest today: $1,300
- F is the value after t years: the double or triple of $1,300
- r is the annual interest rate: 0.074
<u>1. For the amount to double:</u>
Substitute the values and solve for t:

<u>2. For the amount to triple:</u>
<u />

According to Quora dot com, US magazines are viewed as historically dependent on advertising revenue hence why subscriptions to magazines are historically very low as advertising is used to subsidise cover price or subscription cost.
With the general collapse of print publications in the US, particularly led by the drying up of physical newsstand presence, magazines have a harder time getting into consumer's hands. This means that advertisers are less likely to spend in a publication (readership decreasing) and then advertising revenues go down, making magazines less and less profitable.
I realize this is quit lengthy so I'd sum it up to saying the business model for magazines has traditionally been the selling of advertising space ... Not sure if this is what you're looking for