Answer:
d. an approach to gaining knowledge about behavior and mental processes by observation and measurement only
Explanation:
In philosophy, empiricism is a school of psychology that focuses in the way we gain knowledge and it establishes that <u>we can only gain real knowledge by the information we get from our senses and experiences</u>, in other words, empiricism gives importance to the <u>empirical evidence</u> that we gain from our experiences and therefore to the observations and measures we can do (instead of relying on reasoning and what our mind tells us)
Therefore, empiricism is an approach to gaining knowledge about behavior and mental processes by observation and measurement only.
Answer:
recover damages
Explanation:
From the explanation above,we can deduce or conclude that this is a clear case of fraud in which the aforementioned parties which are Don(victim)a and Eve(perpetrator) of this case of fraud.
First and foremost,we should have an idea of what fraud means or connotes-It is an intentional or purposeful act deception by a individual(s) or body as the case may be towards another individual(s) or entity for the purpose of financial or material gains,not minding the medium in which it was portrayed.And it centres around lies,in order to convince or confuse the victim as the case maybe.
So in this case,Eve having lied to Don about having access to a stock-trading algorithm which could multiply an investment and thus,it wasn't so,then Don would have to file a suit and a proof of injury is required to recover damages in order to void the contract and get back money paid earlier on the basis of the contract,instead of affirming the contract because no sort of financial gains were made in the stock-trading transaction.
Answer:
The hypothetical-deductive method has several essential steps: observation of the phenomenon to be studied, creation of a hypothesis to explain said phenomenon, deduction of consequences or propositions more elementary than the hypothesis itself, and verification or verification of the truth of the deduced statements. .
Explanation:
<u>We could say that this method was very aptly applied in the case of children of children of the peace movement in Colombia, because first The situation or problem was observed and recognized ;</u>more than 140 student leaders formed a special council. They divided into various "commissions" to discuss different aspects of the conflict. There was a commission for the construction of peace, a commission for human rights, another for displaced persons, etc. They met in a large room, with each commission supported by one of the adults. For many of the students, the idea of being asked what they thought about war and how they could help peace was a revelation. An example of this was that of Farlis Calle, who was then fifteen years old and who later became a prominent leader in the National Movement for Children for Peace, asked why they did not teach peace education in Colombian schools. "How can we learn to be peaceful if our teachers don't help us understand what it means? No one here has lived in peace. We have been fighting from the moment we were born. "At the end of the two-day session, the various commissions had come up with many suggestions: for peace education, recreation projects, cultural events, and" a youth movement working for peace.
<u>After taking advantage of Machel's visit, Farlis Calle had been chosen by the students as the first child mayor of Apartad & oacute; and they believed that this gave them the constitutional right to form a local government of children. So here come the proposals and verification of results</u> by means of which notices were sent to the municipal schools, for others to know that they could and should participate in their government , and soon as many as 200 children attended peace meetings three times a week, gathering on soccer fields and parks.
Answer:
The idea of rule of law is that once the laws are made, everyone should follow them, both the citizens of the country and the government of the country. ... This is quite important because it means that the government can't do whatever it wants. It has to follow the rules that have been set.
Explanation:
No, it was stealing. And they horribly mistreated the natives following settlement. Early Americans were selfish. But that’s how history goes.
