Sorry i don’t speak English
Answer:
That he always try hard and sometimes also learns from his mistake
Answer:
Cognitive
Explanation:
Attitude is the generalized way a person thinks and acts when presented with a situation.
The cognitive component of attitude is responsible for why the person feels and behaves the way they do when presented with a situation.
For example, a person is afraid of snakes, this is the affective component of attitude
As a result the person avoids snakes, this is the behavioral component of attitude.
The above two components are dependent on the cognitive component as the person thinks of snakes as dangerous.
Here, the statement indicates why the person the feels and behaves the way he/she does when confronted by a person that contradicts themselves.
Hence, this shows the cognitive component of attitude.
Answer:
In its most blunt form, "Americanization" removes the ability to appreciate cultural diversity. If Americanization results in products, goods, and consciousness that reflects only what is present in America, heterogeneity is lost. Americanization tends to expand and subsume other cultural notions of the good.
Answer: It had a History of Protecting Slavery and Segregation – This is often cited as one of the main detriments of the system of federalism that we have in this country, that since slavery was a state issue, it was something that could not be removed on the national level.
It Allows for Inequalities Between Different States – For example, instead of education funding throughout the country being the same, since it is a state issue, some states will spend more, per capita, on education than other states, causing what could be considered a disparity. The same goes for other things, as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs.
The Blockage of Nationalist Policies by States – States can fight against the existence of certain national laws by challenging them in court, or going out of their way to not enforce those national laws, or even deliberately obstructing enforcement of national laws.
Racing to the Bottom – One argument given is that states will compete with each other in an oppositional way, by reducing the amount of benefits they give to welfare recipients compared to, say, a neighboring state, motivating the undesirables to go to the neighboring state, thereby reducing their welfare costs even more. This reduction of state benefits to needy has been deemed the ‘race to the bottom.’
