What can be logically concluded about each option:
- <u><em>Faideaux is the speaker´s only dog.</em></u> No. Because the speaker indicated the name of the dog that won, so he/she must have others;
- <u><em>The speaker has more than one dog.</em></u> Yes. Because the speaker mentioned the dog's name. He/She made it clear that it was Faideaux, not another;
- <u><em>Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</em></u> Faideaux competed and won, but it can not be concluded that it was the only one competing;
- <em><u>Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</u></em> It also has no way to conclude that the speaker´s dogs were with Faideaux at the county dog show.
Answer:
Mark Brainliest
A is answer.
Explanation:
Paraphrase the passage below from The Odyssey: A Prodigious Man Slept in this cave alone and took his flocks to graze afield remote from all companions knowing none but savage ways a brute so huge he seemed no man at all of those who eat good wheaten bread but he seemed rather a shaggy mountian reared in solitude.
Answer:
An opinion that is already held
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Social networking is the use of sites to interact with others users.
Explanation:
"confident and heroic" is the one phrase that <span>best describes the way Walter sees himself in his imaginary world. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "C".
"respectful" is the word among the choices given that </span>is the best antonym for the word derisive. <span>The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "B".</span>
