Answer:
an interview with a 14-year-old boy who earned $5,000 making and selling cheesecakes
Explanation:
found online
she presents herself as a patriot
Answer: (<?, ?, "green", ?, ?, "red", ? >, {2, 5})
Explanation:
Note the use of parentheses, commas, square brackets, double quotes, and parentheses. It is a good idea to consult the Array Kernel mathematical model and make a connection between it and the correct answer shown above. Furthermore, it is also a good idea to consult the contract for each method or you can say that constructor called as well.
Answer:
The author was trying to convey the apathetic attitude of the rich towards the workingman.
Explanation:
The terms used by the author highlighted the negative ways the rich French class and the ruling class viewed the poor workingman. The term louts for example means an uncouth or aggressive person while the term Jack was used to describe the ordinary man who rendered services to the rich.
The author's use of these terms would help the reader to see how lowly the government thought of the poor to the extent that they failed to consider them and were taken unawares at the peasants' revolt.
Answer:
A warrior <u>frightens</u> a gruesome monster <u>away.</u>
Explanation:
When you complete a sentence you have to make sure that the combination o verb and predicate are compatible, and that they express in the best possible way what you are trying to say. So let's analyze the answers:
1) frightens; away: this is grammatically correct, and both words combine well and add meaning to the message.
2) splits; in half: this is grammatically incorrect, it would have to be "into halves" or "in two"
3) kills; forever: kills already implies is forever, it is repetitive
4)beats; in pieces: beats doesn't imply that the monster was split into pieces, so these two words don't combine.
