Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 300
p = 5% = 0.05
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of dead pixels , x = 24
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from excel.
P-value = 0.00856
Since the p-value is smaller than the significance level, we fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it. We accept the alternate hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you want to do inverse operations like I said on the last equation
Just divide -4 with 64
You have to flip the inequality sign because you divided by a negative
Answer: g ≥ -16
Now what is greater than or equal to -16?
Answer =
-16
-11
-6
-13
Factorize using the difference of squares identity.

Then

230% in the simplest form is 2.3
Hope this helps have a nice day :)