1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LenKa [72]
3 years ago
6

Please help me, I will mark as brainliest.

Mathematics
1 answer:
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
7 0
I think it is student 1
You might be interested in
If a basketball was dropped 32 feet from a second floor of a home, how far would it rebound if it bounciness was
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

23.68

Step-by-step explanation:

74% = 74/100

\frac{74}{100} · \frac{32}{1} = 23.68

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. How many fifties are there in one hundred thousand?​
VladimirAG [237]
There are 2,000 fifties in one hundred thousand
7 0
2 years ago
Which statement about triangles is true
Salsk061 [2.6K]
C is the correct answer. An equilateral triangle is a type of triangle.
6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE ANSWER FAST ITS DUE RN
Lena [83]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n > 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • From sea level, a submarine descends 92.5 meters every minute. In 15 minutes, how many meters will the submarine be from its sta
    11·1 answer
  • Part A: Solve −np − 70 < 40 for n.
    15·1 answer
  • You bought a large cooler that holds 5 gallons. How many quarts is that?
    15·2 answers
  • 20 POINTS BRAINLIEST
    10·1 answer
  • A circle with a radius of 5 cm has an area of 25π cm2. Which is the best approximation for the area of one-half of this circle?
    8·1 answer
  • A car travels at an average speed of 48 miles per hour. how long does it take to travel 204 miles?
    10·1 answer
  • Solve the proportion 26/z = 13/22
    12·2 answers
  • Solve the inequality a/5 less than 1.
    9·2 answers
  • 9 * 35
    9·1 answer
  • Pls help i don’t know how to simplify lol
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!