Answer:
No, he didn't
Explanation:
Marx believed that the relationship between the lower class and upper class were exclusively beneficial for the upper class.
According to his perspective, Upper class owned the resources and employed the labors from the lower class. The profit that generated from that labor mostly will obtained by the upper class while the lower class obtain very little from it. On top of that, the sales of the product that created by the effort were mostly bought by the lower class citizens and trapped them in never ending cycle.
The answer is Andrew jackson I think
The answer is "party machine".
Political machine, in U.S. legislative issues, a gathering association, headed by a solitary supervisor or little absolutist gathering, that summons enough votes to keep up political and authoritative control of a city, province, or state.
Answer:
Multiple causes took place that eventually caused many colonists to go against Great Britain.
Explanation:
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, there were many causes that continued to pile up. Parliament had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists didn't like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war.
Most colonists disagreed. Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.
Varied amounts is a good bet. You have a certain amount to pay for objects and bills also have amounts so is easier.
Durable is also good but money can be regained by the bank or job.
Portable is also good but in other times people paid with gold bars which were quiet heavy.
Limited Supply is not it because you need it. So factories keep on producing.
