I briefly learned about the Aztec and Inca's and from what I know, Cortes and Pizarro were both Spanish conquistadors. Cortes conquered the Aztec empire brutally, killing many common people as well as soldiers, much of Aztecs wealth was taken away and the Aztec people lived under Spanish rule for approximately 300 years.
I suggest reading back into your lesson and taking notes; it helps a lot!
Answer:
d) The importance of visual cues in speech processing
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. The options for this question are:
a) Coarticulation
b) Phonemic restoration
c) Word boundary effects
d) The importance of visual cues in speech processing
When we communicate with one another we are usually using different visual cues during our speech to help the other person understand and get a better understanding of what we are saying and by our gestures we also increase the interest of our audience in what we are saying.
In this example, Heather notes that it's easier to understand her sister's speech on Skype than on telephone. It is clear that <u>when we're on the telephone we really don't see the person or their cues and gestures</u>, and we do see those when we are in Skype. These cues help us understand the speech better because these physical cues help us guide us through the speech. Therefore, the phenomenon may be an illustration of d) The importance of visual cues in speech processing
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
i dont know but i am going to try sorry i made a mistake