B is likely the correct answer.
There are very few economists who advocate for the privatization of the military as the privatization of military has interesting efficiency and national security concerns. (Militaries in the hands of CEOs...)
Instead, many economists see the military as an example of the government providing for the protection of the collective common good and that it is most efficient and necessary for the government to provide this service.
It is most definitely the fourth one
Answer:
The four complete sentences that describe how the Pueblo interacted with their environment are:
The pueblo context was in the southern part of the nowadays United States, the climate is hard in all seasons.
The pueblo lived in a structured net of rooms called "pueblos" that was composed of common rooms were people reunited, living rooms, and religious rooms.
Pueblos were built primarily with clay and mud. Their principal economic activity was farming.
The irrigation systems allowed to develop an industry to satisfy all the inhabitants' needs.
Explanation:
The reasons behind these answers are that first of all "pueblos" were communities in the southern part of the modern united states of America. They were built with clay, and mud has it was the cheapest building material available. Their people were basically independent and built a net of pueblos to maintain themselves communicated and organized. Their primary source of resources was agriculture and they used to satisfy all their necessities.
Rulers were passed from father to son. They expanded the farming so there was more food, so rulers could support many soldiers. The soldiers attacked neighboring villages and the dynasty grew
