Answer:
Explanation:
1)
: All group means equal or 
At least one of the treatment group means are different
ANOVA TABLE
<u>Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
</u>
Between Groups 213.5 3 71.16667 0.65 0.5975 3.490295
Within Groups 1312.5 12 109.375
MSB = SSB / DFB = 71.16667
MSE = SSE / DFE = 109.375
F = MSB / MSE = 0.650667
3) P-value: 0.597576
The test statistic is not significant and failed to reject the null hypothesis.
4) The test statistic is not significant. So, there is no evidence to conclude that there is a difference between groups.
Answer:
No, we can’t say
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to decide if we can say that Guatemala’s standard of living grew more than that of the US’ standard of living between the years 1993 and 2003 given the pointers in the question.
We cannot say that this is correct because of the following reasons;
As observed from the question, the US growth rate was calculated between the years 1948-2003, which is indicative of a 55 year span. Now, comparing this with that of Guatemala, we can see that the span here is just 10 years I.e from 1993 to 2003.
Also, we were not provided with the population growth rate in both countries and this makes it difficult to judge which of the two countries have a better growth in terms of standard of living
Answer:
Cost variance= 7 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each bat requires 1 kg of aluminum at $18 per kg and 0.25 direct labor hours at $20 per hour. Overhead is assigned at the rate of $40 per direct labor hour. Assume the actual cost to manufacture one metal bat was $40.
Estimated cost= 18 + 0.25*20 + 0.25*40= 33
Actual cost= 40
Cost variance= 7 unfavorable
Answer:
D. Its purpose is to relate the income tax expense to the items which affect the amount of tax.
Answer:
to attract customers
Explanation:
they are put on places where people are many and they can acces the advertisement easily
