Hey there!
<u>Understanding what the question is asking:</u>
We understand that the question is asking about that we would have to right or propose a new amendment for the Constitution that would describe or establish a critical 'right' that would not be currently protected by the document, which is the 'bill of rights'. And then, after analyzing this, we would have to consider why this is not being protected. Let's get started!
<u>Answer:</u>
The first amendment that was not protect, was the following: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” 
answer.
<u>How?</u>
The reason why this is not protected is because the congress believed that protecting a law the is just a freedom of speech would not need to be protected. Which, in the case, I agree with this also.
But, just because the government can not a make a law about this, they can still handle consequence within court about this.
The main difference between the newer and older stone age was that in the newer one, crop growing and domestication of different types of animals was becoming more and more common in different villages or societies. This was not the case in the older stone age.
Hello!
The public could participate in the budget process by possibly raising their taxes.
Enjoy.
~Isabella
a transegression is the act of going against the law bribery can encourage it simply because its in the same realm of a transegression kind of like "yolo" you only live once. goto collerado<im sure i spelled that wrong> smoke some weed.
anyways it can encourage bad things on us because well 1 were either to deep in the situation or 2 we have no way of getting the thing we want. its kind of a trade at that point . how desperate can you make the victim is the real question( desperation is caused by wants drugs alcohol and sexual pleasure in some cases) really anything that feeds off of emotions like hope.
the onslaught can play with the victims heart emotions and personal devotions by either threatening another think about bank robberies in movies.
The people should rule the government
