Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
Popular Sovereignty should be your answer. Have a great day.
Answer:
Utilitarian
Explanation:
The approach Gina is using in this ethical dilemma is known as Utilitarian approach.
Utilitarianism satisfies the fact that the most ethical choice produces the greatest good for larger number. This ethical theory reveals the right from the wrong by solely focusing on the outcome. It's concern is the consequences of ethical decisions.
Therefore, since Gina is suggesting for a sidestepping of the rules which will result to a greater good than following procedures, Gina is taking the utilitarian approach.
The correct answer is subculture
The notion of subculture is quite common in sociology and anthropology. The concept is used to refer to a group of people, usually a minority, with a set of specific characteristics (behaviors and beliefs), which represents a subdivision within a dominant culture of your community.
In order for us to better understand the concept of subculture, it is first important that we know what culture means. And for that we must make an analysis as to the broader notion of that term.
