Answer:
In the first two decades of the twentieth century, the relationship between the United States and Japan was marked by increasing tension and corresponding attempts to use diplomacy to reduce the threat of conflict. Each side had territory and interests in Asia that they were concerned the other might threaten. U.S. treatment of Japanese immigrants, and competition for economic and commercial opportunities in China also heightened tensions. At the same time, each country’s territorial claims in the Pacific formed the basis for several agreements between the two nations, as each government sought to protect its own strategic and economic interests.
Explanation:
I think the answer you are looking for is yes :)
Answer:
If you mean the Missouri Compromise...it means that there'll be an invisible 36'30 degree parallel line that'll divide the South territory of the U.S. (South Carolina, North Carolina, Maryland, Kentuck, etc.) and the North territories of the US (New England, Ohio, Pennsylvannia, etc). The purpose of that divison is to decided witch state will have slave and which will have no slave. Any states that comes into the US below the 36'30 parallel line will become a slave state, and those above the line will be a free state. This will maintain the balance in the government between southern and northern represenatives. It also gave more power to the federal goverment as they can decided wheter or not to let a state join in as slave or free. Instead of having the states choose. Hope that helps:)
Explanation:
The members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) entered into a defensive alliance, with the main agreement being that they would come to the aid of any member of NATO that was attacked by the Soviet Union or its allies.
NATO was formed in 1949. Its original members were <span>Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, the United Kingdom, the </span>United States, Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark and Iceland.
Today, NATO has 29 member nations. After the demise of the Soviet Union and its alliance organization, the Warsaw Pact, NATO's focus has shifted somewhat. But NATO remains a powerful organization in international politics.
