Hopefully this works as an example x
There is no denying the fact that the government has to take care of several pressing issues such as poverty, unemployment and illiteracy. This is particularly true in the case of developing countries. However, this does not mean that the government should not spend money on arts.
Art represents a country and its heritage. Take, for instance, the case of India. The country is famous for its exquisitely sculpted monuments, temples and palaces. They were the handiwork of artists of the bygone era. Even today, the temples and monuments at Konark, Rajasthan and Madurai attract tens of thousands of local and international tourists. They showcase the rich cultural history of the country and elevate its status. If the kings of those times had not patronised art and artists we would not have these monuments to show off now. Not only the monuments but other forms of art like dance and music also need to be preserved for future generations. Otherwise, we will lose touch with our roots.
Government funding is crucial for the existence of arts. Art itself does not generate much revenue and hence artists, especially the lesser-known ones, have to struggle to make a living. This deters many of them from pursuing art as a profession. The only way to kindle their passion is to provide them financial assistance. By doing so, the government can not only protect its artists from starvation but also preserve his cultural legacy. Spending money on arts is also a way of generating money and creating employment. For example, if the government conducts art festivals and exhibitions, they will attract a lot of visitors and return the investment. Such events also provide employment to a number of people. Thus, it is evident that spending on arts is not a waste of resources.
To conclude, it is important for the government to invest in various social and economic welfare schemes. Likewise, it is equally important to invest in arts.
I have done research on it and I would say B also
The Tempest opens in the midst of a storm, as a ship containing the king of Naples and his party struggles to stay afloat. On land, Prospero and his daughter, Miranda, watch the storm envelop the ship. Prospero has created the storm with magic, and he explains that his enemies are on board the ship.
If you're asking if that's what he did, then yes. He was fascinated with the body in motion, and wanted to experiment with Muybridge to make chronophotographs of men jumping and running.
Answer:
Schubert: Franz Schubert was born in Vienna. His father was a schoolmaster. He was the earliest master of the Romantic art song. He was strictly a musical composer and did not hold any other official musical position. He was the first Viennese composer who earned his living writing musical compositions. He taught at his father's school in his later teen years and he was unhappy with the job. He composed some of his best works during this time. He wrote over 600 songs and also composed symphonies, masses, piano sonatas, and quartets. His works Erlkonig 1815 (The Erkling) is one of the finest examples of musical romanticism. His popular orchestral works include The Unfinished Symphony and The Great C Major Symphony. Die Forelle, a song about a trout, was one of his well-known works with a folk-songlike melody.
Explanation:
This is the exact answer for plato / edmentum
