Answer:
Isolates
Isolates are completely detached. They don't care about their leaders, know anything about them or respond to them in any obvious way. Their alienation is, nevertheless, of consequence. By default – by knowing nothing and doing nothing – isolates strengthen leaders who already have the upper hand.
Bystanders
Bystanders observe but do not participate. They make a deliberate decision to stand aside, disengaging from their leaders and the group. This withdrawal is, in effect, a declaration of neutrality that amounts to tacit support for the status quo.
Participants
Participants are in some way engaged. They clearly favor or oppose their leaders and the groups and organizations of which they are a part. In either case, they care enough to invest some of what they have (time, for example) to have an impact.
Activists
Activists feel strongly about their leaders, and they act accordingly. They are eager, energetic and engaged. Because they are heavily invested in people and process, they work hard on behalf of their leaders or to undermine and even unseat them.
Diehards
Diehards are prepared to die for their cause, whether that is an individual, an idea or both. Diehards are deeply devoted to their leaders or, in contrast, ready to remove them from positions of power, authority and influence by any means necessary. Diehards are defined by their dedication, including their willingness to risk life and limb. Being a diehard is all-consuming. It is who you are. It determines what you do.
Explanation:
The scientist has to channel some factors. in certain circumstances, that on the surface seem unimportant, that can have a great consequences and behavior. failure to recognize the importance of situational influences on behavior together with tendency to over emphasize the situational factors.
Members <span>of the command staff are referred to as, officers.
HOPE THIS HELPS! ^_^</span>
The development worker conclude that Peasants make rational but self-defeating choices,<span>passing poverty on to subsequent generations.
For example, their decision to not pursuing further education is considered rational considering their situation (without works, their families wouldn't be able to survive), but at the same time, this decision is self-defeating because it prevents them from accessing high paying positions.</span>
Answer:
80% of India’s population is rural
