1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Y_Kistochka [10]
2 years ago
12

5 Based upon the information you have learned throughout this unit on blood spatter analysis, do you feel that analyzing blood s

patter is the most reliable way to gain information about a particular crime scene? Do you think that analyzing the blood spatter gives you enough information to be able to charge someone with the possible crime? Conduct your own research on this as well, and support your answer with a real-life case where blood spatter analysis was used. Include a copy of the URL to the article/site you found the real-life case example.
Law
2 answers:
denis-greek [22]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: yes. I do believe that a blood splatter can lead to the discovery of who the murderer was. When DNA is taken, you can see who had touched the blood. Whoever had touched the blood is either the murderer or involved. It’s a crime to mess with evidence, so whoever did touch the blood would be held in court otherwise

Explanation:

PilotLPTM [1.2K]2 years ago
7 0
Sjhsh73738737373738jxjdufjif
You might be interested in
Please paraphrase this :
algol [13]

Paraphrase = express the meaning of (the writer or speaker or something written or spoken) using different words, especially to achieve greater clarity.

The Loose interpretation states that the Federal government can do what is good for the country even if the Constitution doesn't explicitly allow it, but the Strict interpretation states that the Federal government can only do what the Constitution says it can do.

         Can become

                  \/

    The Loose interpretation says that the Federal government can do something outside of the Constitution as long as it is good for the country. That being said, the strict interpretation says that the Federal government must stick to the Constitution.

No hacer español para esto, ya que está escrito en inglés

8 0
2 years ago
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA):
ratelena [41]

Answer:

<h3>b. requires employers to furnish each employee with a place of employment that is free from hazards.</h3>

Explanation:

  • The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA) was implemented to provide safe and health friendly working conditions for employees who work in factories, industries, and other manufacturing sites.
  • The OSHA puts forwards a number of conditions that every employers need to adopt in a working place to safeguard the employees. One of the mandatory condition of OSHA is that requires employers to furnish each employee with a place of employment that is free from hazards.
7 0
3 years ago
Rules are in the best interest of our?
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

Regulation Best Interest is a new SEC rule that aims to provide clarity for consumers across the financial services industry by imposing a higher standard of care rules for brokers, requiring them to stop calling themselves advisors if they aren't being held to a fiduciary standard of care

3 0
3 years ago
Finding individual characteristics, like DNA samples or bullets, which belong to a particular object or person is necessary befo
Lubov Fominskaja [6]
It is C because thats what summons you to court and gives u all the info when to go and atuff
8 0
3 years ago
Intellectual property can be protected by
quester [9]

Four types of intellectual property rights

What does each type of intellectual property right protect?

Multiple types of IP rights can be used to protect an invention

i. Trade Secret Protection

How to identify your trade secret?

When to protect your idea as a trade secret rather than securing a patent?

ii. Trademark protection

iii. Copyright Protection

iv. Patent Protection

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is our society judged?
    15·2 answers
  • 01:37:34
    13·1 answer
  • A democratic government differs from a dictatorship in the way that it:
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde
    13·1 answer
  • Why is it good to be calm when interrogated by police?
    15·1 answer
  • The concepts of Expectation, Reliance and Nominal damages are incompatible with Sections 73 and 74 of Contract Act. Furthermore,
    6·1 answer
  • Please list 2 of the 4 exceptions to the Miranda requirements.​
    12·1 answer
  • 4. How much were her medical bills?
    10·1 answer
  • Why do community report the crime instead of taking it in their own hands<br>​
    11·2 answers
  • Briefly explain the procedure that must be followed when passing legislation​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!