The answer is (A). Plath was known to use vivid imagery, metaphors and smiles. She was a very creative poet. So, it's the use of largely figurative language which best describes her technique.
McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
My friends and I went to the new, local cinema to watch the action movies.
or
My friends and I went to the local cinema to watch the new action movies.
Explanation:
Nouns: <em>I</em>, <em>cinema</em>, <em>friends</em>, <em>movies</em>
Articles: the, <em>the</em>
Prepositions: <em>to</em>, <em>to</em>
Conjunctions: <em>and</em>
Adjectives: <em>my</em>, <em>new</em>, <em>local</em>, <em>action</em>
Verbs: <em>watch</em>, <em>went</em>
<em />
<em />
<em />
PS: I'D GO FOR THE SECOND ONE
This question is about "I Hear America Singing"
Answer:
The structure of the poem suggests that all types of work are important to American industry, including housework.
Explanation:
In "I Hear America Singing, the poet shows the importance of work in the country. For this he stretches the poem in lines that show different types of work, but that all workers sing the same song. With that, the poet means that everyone jobs are important for the development of the country and that everyone seeks the same goals and that, in a way, are united to each other, even domestic work is interconnected, showing that the country needs all workers committed to growth.
