3 years ago

If w= <2, -5> and y= 2,0>, find 2w+y

Mathematics

1 answer:

Eva8 [605]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

F un gong jjkpjm d gjgyfgdbb

You might be interested in

how can u stand applying math to every thing doesn't it make every thing repetitive and why does every thing need a pattern does

Dominik [7]

Because math sucks like really really sucks

5 0

2 years ago

Please help me !!!!!

Tasya [4]

Answer:

B. A dilation with a scale factor of 0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

A. is wrong because it is congruent transformation because reflections keep the angles and side lengths of the figure the same.

B. is right because it is NOT congruent because a dilation of any scale factor other than 1 results in a similar figure, because the side lengths are proprtional but not equivalent

C. is wrong because translations keep the angles and side lengths of the figure the same.

D. is wrong because a scale factor of 1 changes nothing about the figure.

4 0

3 years ago

Either Table T or Table R represents a proportional relationship. Table T x −2 −1 0 1 y −6 −3 0 3 Table R x −1 0 1 2 y 0 3 6 9 P

harina [27]

Answer: 2,1 4,1 5,7 and yeah im not sure what else to put

poggers hehe

3 0

2 years ago

How do you rationalise this surd?

Ksivusya [100]

$\frac{1 + \sqrt{3} }{ \sqrt{2} } \times \frac{ \sqrt{2} }{ \sqrt{2} } = \frac{ \sqrt{2} + \sqrt{6} }{2}$
here you go

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

−15(x−4)=−2<br><br> Hurry! Brainliest if right!

devlian [24]

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is 62/15.

I can't explain it bc I'm taking a test rn but still-

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers