<span>Minor crime, especially that committed by young people.I think i have thought is it affect by even can young people can not do the committed crime.</span>
Answer:
A. $54,000
B. $9,000
Explanation:
A. Computation for the depreciable cost of the equipment
Book value, 1/1/17 $58,000
($76,000 – $18,000)
Less salvage value $4,000
Depreciable cost $54,000
($58,000-$4,000)
Therefore the depreciable cost of the equipment is $54,000
B. Computation for the revised annual depreciation
Revised annual depreciation = $54,000÷6 years
Revised annual depreciation = $9,000
Therefore the revised annual depreciation is $9,000
The core product alludes to the overnight rental of a room. Its parts are benefited level, booking, nature of the procedure, and the client's part in the utilization of the room. Supplementary administrations incorporate things like stopping, room administration, reservations, and a breakfast buffet. Conveyance of both the center and the supplementary administrations is given electronically, by means of lodging worker, or by the client. Telephone utilize and pay TV are naturally charged to the room. Room administration and registration are given by an inn representative. Most breakfast buffets are self-benefit, requiring the client to make a move.
Answer:
The correct answer is it becomes variable cost.
Explanation:
In the short run there are fixed costs and variable costs which sum up the total costs incurred. This is because in short run not all factors are variable, some factors are fixed as well. So, expenses on fixed factors come under fixed and those on variable factors come under variable costs.
In the long run though, all the factors are variable. All factors can be changed. So there are no fixed costs in the long run run. All the costs incurred on all factors become variable costs.
Answer:
A) change in the cost of eating index = <u>20% increase</u>
B) Suppose that consumers are completely indifferent between two chickens and one ham. For this example, how large is the substitution bias in the official "cost-of-eating" index?
The <u>INCREASE</u> in the cost-of-eating index is <u>18</u> %.
The <u>OVERESTIMATE</u> of inflation in the cost of eating reflects substitution bias.
Explanation:
2015
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $4 $120
hams 10 $5 $50
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $250
2016
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $5 $150
hams 10 $7 $70
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $300
A) ($300 - $250) / $250 = 20%
B)
if consumers are indifferent for 2 chickens per 1 ham, then the new basket should be assuming consumers will purchase the cheapest option:
2016
product units unit cost total
hams 25 $7 $175
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $255
the increase in inflation would have been = ($255 - $250) / $250 = 2%
the substitution bias = reported inflation - real inflation = 20% - 2% = 18%
