Answer:
Agent Armstrong needs to be licensed and appointed in every state in which beneficiaries to whom he markets ABC MA plans are located.
Explanation:
In the given scenario XYZ Agency maintains a website marketing the MA plans with which it has contracts. So they are not in one location.
Clients from multiple states can subscribe to their services via website.
Agent Armstrong follows up with individuals who request more information about ABC MA plans via the website and tries to persuade them to enroll in ABC plans.
Since clients enroll in different locations there is a need for Armstrong to be licensed and appointed in every state in which beneficiaries to whom he markets ABC MA plans are located.
This will satisfy the varying compliance rules that each state of operation may have. Thereby providing seamless service delivery to customers of XYZ agency.
Answer: Aesthetic
Explanation:
The type of product modification that is likely to make the greatest impact on a food product is aesthetic.
Product Modification simply means the improvement of an existing products in such a way that necessary changes are made to the product's nature, size, color, characteristics, nature, packing etc. in order to meet consumers demand. Aesthetic in food products will help the product stand out and beautify it.
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Kindly check the attached image below to see the step by step explanation to the question above.
Answer:
To evaluate the choice, we have to calculate the present value of future cash flows and compare it with the cost. We use the following formula
present value = C × [ 
]
where
C = yearly payments = 75000
i = interest rate = 8%
n = no. of years = 15
put the given values in above equation, we get
Present value = 75000 ×8.559478688
= 641,961
Since the present value of cash flow 641,961 is less than the cost 750,000, I would not recommend it.
If Interest rate = 5%, then:
Do the same procedure as above but take i=5%
Present value = 75000 × 10.37965804
= 778,474
Since the present value of future cash flows 778,474 is greater than the cost 750,000, I would recommend it.
