The answer is D. <span> Indentured servitude was a much different institution than slavery. Indentured servants would work for a period of a few years or more. Indentured servants were treated way better than slaves. Slavery was cruel and inhumane. Slaves would remain slaves their whole life unless their master freed them.</span>
Answer:
A. The Industrial Revolution made factories produce goods more efficiently.
Explanation:
We can immediately rule out two answers as not making sense with the effect. Factories going out of business would not mean more goods, it would mean less. Factories producing goods less efficiently would also mean less goods, not more.
The Industrial Revolution bringing more workers into the city makes sense, but we want to find the answer that talks about goods specifically, which leaves us with the answer of A.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
A: The number of African American voters in Mississippi increased significantly.
Freedom Summer, also known as the the Mississippi Summer Project, was a 1964 campaign aimed at increasing black voter registration in Mississippi, sponsored by civil rights organizations like the Congress on Racial Equality (CORE) and the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).
Fifty Freedom Schools were stablished, and managed to register twelve hundred African Americans that year. By 1966, more than half of African-Americans in southern states had registered to vote
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9858607#readmore
Explanation:
Answer:
d. Slavery's opponents could build no persuasive argument against it.
Explanation:
The region of Southampton county, Virginia witnessed a slave rebellion in August 1831 which is known as Nat Turner's rebellion, after the name of slave Nat Turner who led it. Slaves killed 65 people and the aftermath was a brutal suppression of rebellion after a few days. State legislature came up with new laws to curb the civil rights of slaves and the dominant position was ensured to their masters to exert greater control on them.
The exclusionary rule was applied to all levels of government in the Supreme Court case, Mapp v. Ohio 1961. In previous Supreme Court cases, the exclusionary rule had been applied to various levels of government instead of a uniform label. This particular Supreme Court ruling was important it's support of the application of the Fourth Amendment, prohibiting the use of unreasonable search and seizure to acquire evidence against someone in a criminal case.
