Answer:
$4,807.69
Explanation:
The first step is to calculate the requirement for coinsurance
= 80/100 × 130,000
= 0.8× 130,000
= 104,000
Therefore the amount in which the insurance person will pay can be calculated as follows
= 100,000/104,000 × 5000
= 0.96153×5000
= $4,807.69
Answer:
<h2>Spending on infrastructure projects is an example of <u>Discretionary Fiscal Policy</u> aimed at increasing real GDP and employment.</h2>
Explanation:
- A discretionary fiscal policy basically refers to the manipulation or adjustment of various fiscal instruments by the government such as public taxes and government spending.
- The aim of discretionary fiscal policy is to adjust the overall macroeconomic condition in any country based on the existing or current situation or scenario.
- Now,infrastructural spending is part of fiscal policy or instrument to adjust the macroeconomic condition of the country as reflected by necessary modification in the GDP and employment level.Hence, higher infrastructural spending by the government would expectedly increase the residential and commercial construction projects in the country thereby,enhancing the GDP and the employment level in the country and boost the overall economy.
<span>If a product is to be properly commercialized, there must be integration between finance and marketing.</span>
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
<span>the answers is 2,4,5,6</span>
