Answer:
C
Explanation:
Firstly, we consider if the expenses is limited or not limited within the framework of the section 179.
Considering the framework, it can be seen that the expenses of $500,000 is not limited under section 179
The maximum depreciation expenses can be calculated as follows;
(600,000-500,000) * 0.1429 = 14,290
We then add the expenses of section 179 = 500,000
The value of the maximum depreciation expenses is thus 500,000 + 14,290 = 514,290
Answer:
D. Because television advertising is more expensive
Explanation:
Advertisement on the TV involves making a video that has to be of specified standards. Making the video is costly. After making the video, a company has to buys advertising time with media houses which, is also expensive.
Online or internet advertising is cost-effective. Many popular social media sites allow users to post advertisement messages for free.
Answer:
5 years
Explanation:
Given:
For proposal X
The initial Investment = $10,700,000
Useful life = 5 years
Estimated annual net cash inflows for 5 years = $2,140,000
Residual value = $50,000
since,
the depreciation method is a straight line
thus,
payback period for the proposal X will be given as:
Payback period = (Initial investment) / (Estimated annual cash inflows)
on substituting the values, we get
Payback period = $10,700,000 / $2,140,000
or
Payback period for the proposal X = 5 years
Answer:
Major Street
Explanation:
Major street in downtown Washington, DC, is home to the headquarters of many lobbying firms and interest groups and is synonymous with interest-group lobbying.
Major street, also known as the M street in downtown Washington DC is famous due to the clutter of lobbying firms in that specific area of the city.
I hope the answer was helpful.
Thanks for asking.
Answer:
C. A situation where no economic agent would benefit by changing his or her behavior
Explanation:
An economic equilibrium is when the agents are optimizing their decisions and opposing market forces are equal. This point allows the economic agents to maximize their utility and any change from this point will cause all agents to move away from potential maximum benefits.
In a natural equilibrium there is usually no government intervention so option A is false. Option B gives only one agent potential benefits and as such there is no equilibrium. Option D is conditional and may or may not happen as when the agents find missing information they would optimize again and move to an equilibrium.
Hope that helps.