Simplify. Rewrite the expression in the form 9^n. {9^7}{9^5}

(Iready) I need you alot! plss

nadezda [96]

Answer:

when u multiple it it us 100 but when I added it was 21

so it is 100 or 21 sorry if it is not right

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the practice of gathering data and ensuring that it is uniform, accurate, consistent, and complete, including such entit

baherus [9]

Answer: Option 2 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Master data management (MDM) is the practice of gathering data and ensuring that it is uniform, accurate, consistent, and complete, including such entities as customers, suppliers, products, sales, employees, and other critical entities that are commonly integrated across organizational systems.

4 0

3 years ago

Is anyone willing to help me with this? I tried adding this and still no answer. Please help..

GaryK [48]

Answer: C. (-4, -2)

Step-by-step explanation:

First, eliminate one of the variables and solve for the remaining variable:

2x - 5y = 2 → 3(2x - 5y = 2) → 6x - 15y = 6

3x + 2y = -16 → -2(3x + 2y = -16) → -6x - 4y = 32

-19y = 38

y = -2

Next, replace "y" with -2 into either of the original equations to solve for x:

2x - 5y = 2

2x - 5(-2) = 2

2x + 10 = 2

2x = -8

x = -4

x = -4, y = -2

Check:

Plug in the x- and y-values into the other original equation:

3x + 2y = -16

3(-4) + 2(-2) = -16

-12 + -4 = -16

-16 = -16 $\checkmark$

3 0

3 years ago

The mayor of a town has proposed a plan for the annexation of a new bridge. A political study took a sample of 1000 voters in th

garri49 [273]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.42 -0.39}{\sqrt{\frac{0.39(1-0.39)}{1000}}}=1.945$

$p_v =P(Z>1.945)=0.0259$

If we compare the p value obtained with the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of residents who favored annexation is not significantly higher than 0.39.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=1000 represent the random sample taken

$\hat p=0.42$ estimated proportion of residents who favored annexation

$p_o=0.39$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.02$ represent the significance level

Confidence=98% or 0.98

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the proportion is higher than 0.39:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.39$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.39$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.42 -0.39}{\sqrt{\frac{0.39(1-0.39)}{1000}}}=1.945$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.02$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>1.945)=0.0259$

If we compare the p value obtained with the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of residents who favored annexation is not significantly higher than 0.39.

4 0

3 years ago

Using mathematical induction prove whether or not the following statement is true for all positive integers n, or show why it is

aniked [119]

Base case: For $n=1$ , the left side is 2 and the right is $2\cdot1^2=2$ , so the base case holds.