Answer: 22.5 degrees
Step-by-Step Explanation:
As we can see, we are given a line, which is a straight angle. Hence, it will be of 180 degrees.
=> All the angles sum up to 180.
Therefore,
=> 3x + x + 90 = 180
= 4x + 90 = 180
= 4x = 180 - 90 = 90
=> x = 90/4 = 22.5
Therefore, x = 22.5 degrees
Verification:
=> 3x + x + 90 = 180
= 3(22.5) + 22.5 + 90 = 180
= 67.5 + 22.5 + 90 = 180
= 90 + 90 = 180
=> 180 = 180
=> LHS = RHS
Answer:
Keenan's z-score was of 0.61.
Rachel's z-score was of 0.81.
Step-by-step explanation:
Z-score:
Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean 
and standard deviation 
, the z-score of a measure X is given by:
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
Keenan scored 80 points on an exam that had a mean score of 77 points and a standard deviation of 4.9 points.
This means that 
So
Keenan's z-score was of 0.61.
Rachel scored 78 points on an exam that had a mean score of 75 points and a standard deviation of 3.7 points.
This means that 
. So
Rachel's z-score was of 0.81.
<em>Answer:</em>
Complete proof is written below.
Facts and explanation about the segments shown in question :
- As BC = EF is a given statement in the question
- AB + BC = AC because the definition of betweenness gives us a clear idea that if a point B is between points A and C, then the length of AB and the length of BC is equal to the length of AC. Also according to Segment addition postulate, AB + BC = AC. For example, if AB = 5 and BC= 7 then AC = AB + BC → AC = 12
- AC > BC because the Parts Theorem (Segments) mentions that if B is a point on AC between A and C, then AC > BC and AC>AB. So, if we observe the question figure, we can realize that point B lies on the segment AC between points A and C.
- AC > EF because BC is equal to EF and if AC>BC, then it must be true that the length of AC must greater than the length segment EF.
Below is the complete proof of the observation given in the question:
<em />
<em>STATEMENT REASON </em>
___________________________________________________
1. BC = EF 1. Given
2. AB + BC = AC 2. Betweenness
3. AC > BC 3. Def. of segment inequality
4. AC > EF 4. Def. of congruent segments
<em />
<em>Keywords: statement, length, reason, proof</em>
<em>
Learn more about proof from brainly.com/question/13005321</em>
<em>
#learnwithBrainly</em>
Answer:
No, AB is not tangent to C.
If it were tangent, it would form a right angle with the radius, and we could use Pythagorean's Theorem.
3²+6²=7²
9+36=49
45=49 Since this is false, it's not a right angle, and AB is not tangent.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, AB is not tangent to C.
If it were tangent, it would form a right angle with the radius, and we could use Pythagorean's Theorem.
3²+6²=7²
9+36=49
45=49 Since this is false, it's not a right angle, and AB is not tangent.
