The issue with using the side-splitter to solve for x is that the side-splitter theorem is used to find lengths of the sides being split by parallel lines. In this case, the x is on a line that is parallel and thus could not be solved for using this theorem.
If we created a triangle where the tops of the non-parallel lines connected, we would be able to compare the following and solve:

However, none of this would help us solve for x using this theorem.
<u>Answer:</u>
<h2>SA = 157 in²</h2>
<u>Steps:</u>
SA = 2LW + 2WH + 2LH
SA = 2(9×2) + 2(2×11/2) + 2(9×11/2)
SA = 2×18 + 2×22/2 + 2×99/2
SA = 36 + 22 + 99
SA = 157 in²
Answer:
<h3>
14, 15, 16</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
The consecutive integers iincrease by 1. So the middle integer of an odd number of consecutive integers is their mean. Three is an odd number of integers.
45:3 = 15 ← middle number
15 - 1 = 14 ← the smallest number
15 + 1 = 16 ← the largest number
Step-by-step explanation:
Are you sure you wrote the answers correctly?
Answer:
B). SAS similarity.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Δ WVU & ΔCAB,
UV/CA = 17/34 = 1/2
&
VW/AB = 14/28 = 1/2
∵ UV/CA = VW/AB = 1/2
& ∠V = ∠A (Given)
∵ ΔWVU ≅ ΔCAB (by SAS similarity)