Answer:
Explanation:
a red flag used as a warning of danger.
a red flag used as the symbol of socialist revolution.
Answer:
D. Employers are vicariously liable for their employees' negligence.
Explanation:
Respondeat superior is a legal term use when one party is responsible (or has vicarious liability, this is the proper legal term) for the acts of its agents.
No, It is not morally to allow a corporation to escape with criminal culpability since
- The statistical likelihood of an aide is dependent upon the litigant's co-operation in a high level of connivance with the criminal or the head, but the assistant's duties are related to the defendant's responsibility to assign a person visible of a unique relationship to do to improve.
- The acting party is also reproachingly in control of its directors with its vicarious duties.
- In general, it is often a <u>vicarious obligation</u> to adjust <u>criminal culpability</u> in the <u>sensitive working relation</u> in respect of an <u>associate bachelor's degree</u> offense from of the <u>associate's agent</u> or employee to the business on its own.
- Additional charges for the wrongdoing of the personality are levied by the expert or indicative.
- <u>Criminal vicarious</u> danger harms the vital statute that folks should be reprehensibly responsible for their leadership but not the direct one of the others.
- Despite the very fact that accent hazard is a duty for the leadership of directors, the assistant is carrying out a crime opposition, supported by <u>criminal expectations</u> and similarly rejected.
- Single-species conclusions, which seem to force crook obligations to square this same measure, are also very important for those responsible for their horrendously <u>criminal straightforwardness</u>.
- A few square models measure the laws which hold people heinously reliable, whilst also their youth dedicate their wrongs to <u>firearms </u>which have <u>guardian areas</u> and to offenses that decry or behaving badly a child.
- The guardians measure their thinking in all of these ways, for example, by enabling the youth to press their firearms or to be silent.
- This same <u>legislation advances</u> as long as the pervasiveness of youthful people who commit <u>infringements </u>is <u>steadily prevalent</u>.
- Associate obligations are deemed to be the responsibility of the <u>assistant </u>when the character in question is complicit in the head; <u>assistant </u>probability forces are the criminal duties of a visible party of an unknown priest with a <u>character </u>on <u>display</u>.
- Collaborations are vicarious learning bound up in different jurisdictions for violations of the scope of the <u>paintings by experts</u>.
- The <u>single vicarious obligation</u> is not appreciated, but because of the prevalence of young men who perform violations, the legislation is <u>moving forward</u>.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/18869319
Answer: Reflect - In your own words, explain the meaning and purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment. You should use phrases from the amendment to complement your explanation, but not replace it.
Analyze – Explain how the cases of Bakke, the VMI, and Grutter relate to the Fourteenth Amendment.
Evaluate - Do policies that assist a specific group of people fulfill or violate the Fourteenth Amendment? Explain the reasons for your response.
Reflect/Research – Is your opinion on question three consistent or in conflict with your opinion on other cases or laws? Give an example from your study in this course. (You might consider your opinion from Case Study Three. It asked whether juveniles accused of serious crimes should be treated as adults.)
Explanation:
