Answer and Explanation:
American society has a lot of freedom, being, in fact, one of the nations that most promote freedom to its citizens. This is totally justified, since the USA was established as a place where freedom would be full and offered to all citizens. This concept has been maintained over the years, allowing American citizens to have religious, political freedom and to be able to establish their goals in whatever way they think is most appropriate. However, this does not mean that freedom was offered to all on an equal basis, in addition, the concept of freedom is relative among citizens and many believe that their freedom is only allowed when there is order and deprivation of the freedom of other citizens. This search for order has caused many problems for society, especially problems regarding the rights of blacks, women, foreigners, refugees and other social minorities
Answer:
He supports the president, advising him when necessary while also enforcing the congresses written law and is president of the U.S senate.
Explanation:
Answer: No.
Explanation:
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, later amended by the Clayton Act (1914) prohibits agreements in restraint of trade and monopolization. I expressely outlaws competing firms to conspire to consolidate the market by unfair means, restraining the trade of others.
In this case, the standards for non-wood bats set by the NCAA and the NFHS are not meant to establish a monopoly and they don´t restrain Marucci´s trade.
Answer:
Discretion is the latitude granted officials to act under a formal set of rules and in a public capacity. The rules themselves are usually the result of discretion by other actors in the criminal justice system, such as the legislature, which has created the criminal code for the jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Answer:
Although Robert Nozick did not consider himself to be primarily a political philosopher, he is best known for his contributions to it. Undoubtedly, Nozick’s work in epistemology and metaphysics (especially with respect to free will and the “closest continuer” theory of personal identity) has had a significant impact on those fields. However, it was the publication of his first book, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974) that revitalized the political right-wing and set off a firestorm of critical replies and commentaries. While Nozick’s accomplishments reach far beyond the confines of political philosophy, it is safe to say that most recognize him for his work on attempting to provide a justification for the state, setting the limits of government, and trying to convince us that accepting his minimal state could foster a framework for a constellation of communities constituting a sort of utopia.
Anarchy, State and Utopia can also be seen as a critical response to John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, which was published just three years earlier and was considered to be the most robust and sophisticated defense of liberal egalitarianism. Although many credit Rawls for single-handedly rekindling interest in political philosophy, this is likely overstated praise. There is little doubt that Nozick’s systematic criticism of Rawls’ theory of justice and establishment of a rival political theory in Anarchy, State and Utopia also played a major role in bring significant attention back to political philosophy.
