1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vika [28.1K]
2 years ago
8

11. What US Battleship is undefeated?

History
1 answer:
CaHeK987 [17]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C. USS Constitution

Explanation:

The USS Constitution is most noted for her actions during the War of 1812 against the United Kingdom, when she captured numerous merchant ships and defeated five British warships: HMS Guerriere, Java, Pictou, Cyane, and Levant.

You might be interested in
What did w.e.b. dubois have in common with harriet martineau?
VashaNatasha [74]
<span>Both Harriet Martineau and W. E. B. Du Bois are both socialists but the former is British and the later is an American. They both were interested by the promise made by the American constitution in the grounds of democracy but were later appalled as the promise was not exactly fulfilled..</span>
3 0
3 years ago
How different is the practice of anthropology in the 19th century with the 21st century
nataly862011 [7]

The anthropology of religion is the comparative study of religions in their cultural, social, historical, and material contexts.



The English term religion has no exact equivalent in most other languages. For example, burial practices are more likely to be called customs and not sharply differentiated from other ways of doing things. Early Homo sapiens (for example, the Neanderthals at Krapina [now in Croatia]) began burying their dead at least 130,000 years ago. To what end? And how and why have such practices changed over time? What might they have in common with the multitude of burial customs—known to be associated with differing conceptions of death and life—among people in the world today; for example, what might embalming practices in ancient Egypt and 19th-century Bolivia have in common with each other and with 21st-century embalming practices in North America? How do these relate to secondary burials, involving the exhumation and reburial of the corpse or its bones, as in Madagascar and Siberia, or rituals of cremation, as in Japan, India, or France? Paradoxically, anthropologists’ documentation of the enormous diversity of human customs, past and present, puts into question the very existence of “religion” as a single coherent system of practices, values, or beliefs. Indeed, what constitutes “religion” may be hotly debated even among coreligionists. The study of religion in anthropology requires consideration of all these matters, including anthropologists’ own terms of analysis.



Scholars of religion throughout the world have long recognized what the American philosopher and psychologist William James (1902) called “the varieties of religious experience.” Since the mid-19th century, one of the first and most important contributions of anthropologists has been to extend the study of those varieties beyond the formal doctrines and liturgies of established religious institutions to include related customs, regardless of when, where, and by whom they are practiced and whether they are celebrated, suppressed, or taken for granted. The anthropology of religion is the study of, in the words of the English anthropologist Edward Evans-Pritchard (Theories of Primitive Religion [1965]), “how religious beliefs and practices affect in any society the minds, the feelings, the lives, and the interrelations of its members…religion is what religion does.” Although Edward Burnett Tylor’s classic Primitive Culture (1871) documented the wide-ranging doings of his fellow Europeans, most anthropologists in the 19th and early 20th centuries focused on so-called primitive peoples living outside Europe and North America, on the grounds that religion, increasingly defined by contrast to reason, was a historically primitive form of behaviour that was already giving way to science. Subsequent research has proved these assumptions to be wrong. As anthropology has grown to include the study of all humans on an equal footing and the field of anthropology is practiced throughout the world, anthropologists continue to confront their parochial biases.




Over the next century, as museums with anthropological collections continued to develop as research institutions, many of the anthropologists who worked there turned away from collection-based work. Archaeologists and physical anthropologists continued to use collections for study, but, until a late 20th-century revival of interest in the history of anthropology and museums and in studies of material culture and the anthropology of art, few cultural anthropologists worked actively with collections.

The last quarter of the 20th century witnessed great change in the practice of anthropology in museums. The civil rights and decolonization movements of the 1960s increased awareness of the politics of collecting and representation. Ethical issues that had been ignored in the past began to influence museum practices. By the turn of the 21st century, most anthropologists working in museums had understood the need to incorporate diverse points of view in exhibitions and collections care and to rely on the expertise of people from the cultures represented as well as museum professionals. At the same time, many new museums—such as the U’mista Cultural Centre (1980) in Alert Bay, British Columbia, Canada—were established within the communities that created the objects on display. Anthropologists in museums also were concerned with issues such as the ethics of collecting, access to collections and associated data, and ownership and repatriation.


I just got a whole story for you to get it xD (I made some mistakes i think ;-;)

Hope this helps! ~ Kana ^^


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HELP!! I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
Readme [11.4K]
C because muslim women were treated as the lowest class in their society
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ILL MARK YOU BRAINLIEST! WHAT WOULD BE THE TITLE OF THIS PICTURE?<br> HURRY PLEASE!
Vika [28.1K]

Answer: columbian exchange

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What was the free soil position? Where was it the strongest in the United States
Tresset [83]

Answer:

A single-issue party, its main purpose was to oppose the expansion of slavery into the Western territories, arguing that free men on free soil constituted a morally and economically superior system to slavery.

Explanation:

At a convention in Buffalo, New York on August 9, 1848, more than 10,000 men from all the northern states and thee border states met in a huge tent in a city park. The resulting Free Soil Party was built on a coalition of four elements: the previous Liberty Party, Free-Soil Democrats, Barn-burners, and Conscience Whigs

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did ronald reagan modify the resolute desk?
    15·1 answer
  • By the end of 1950 which major country of the world became
    8·2 answers
  • In what landmark case did the Warren Court rule that an accused criminal had the right to a lawyer whether or not the person cou
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these terms represented the united states plan to "retake the pacific" from the japanese?
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the Munich Pact unsuccessful at preventing Hitler from invading Poland?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best example of the idea of "separation of powers" in the American constitutional system? (3 point
    5·1 answer
  • List 3 things that shape ones public opinion? Which is most important?
    13·1 answer
  • What seemed to be missing at the peace treaty
    15·1 answer
  • What are some advantages and disadvantages of a country being under foreign control?
    6·1 answer
  • During World War I, Georgia had more
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!