Answer:
The right answer is "Checks and Balances."
Explanation:
Congress holds the executive branch accountable; courts interpret and apply the laws, judges can revert administrative decisions or policies, for example, by declaring a law unconstitutional.
Democratic republicans was a form of government favoring economy focusing on agriculture and not on industries and there has to be division of power among different levels of government and not having only one level of government.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Democratic Republicans is said to be a type of government which was in the favor of the agriculture for the development of the economy. In this form of government, there was division of powers among the different levels of the government and it was not only kept with one level.
It opposed the industrialized economy and wanted to adopt policies from both the republic and the democratic form. This form of government favored interpretation of the constitution in a strict way.
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
Because superiority complexes in leaders who wanted to show that they were better
sailed to Norway were he was converted to Christianity then he sailed off course on his way to Greenland & he landed on the North American Continent & thatbis were he explores a region called Vinland
