1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tigry1 [53]
3 years ago
15

Compare and contrast the experience and implications of marriage?

History
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
6 0

I'm a little bit confused by the question but I'll give it my best shot!

The idea of marriage has been known for centuries for the ups and downs and this idea still applies to marriages in today's society. The pros of marriage include partnership, joint bank accounts which assist with financial issues, and just the general happiness of getting engaged.

The downsides would be the direct contrasts of the pros, like when a married couple runs into financial issues, this is something both individuals will have to deal with. If you want a divorce, then a whole process in court must be done in order for this to happen which is real unfortunate.

You might be interested in
What was the name if the mass genocide that plagued the Jewish community? 1.Reconstruction
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

I am pretty sure it was the holocaust

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Did the Federalists or Anti- Federalists have more influence on the "Bill of Rights?"
Tatiana [17]

The Anti-Federalists had more influence on the Bill of Rights, as they were the ones who wanted it in the first place. The Federalists thought a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while the Anti-Federalists pushed for it.

The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government. The federal government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, and numerous other important matters. The Anti-Federalists agreed with this, as they associated having a strong government with British tyranny. They thought that if the government was powerful, they may abuse the citizens. The Federalists on the other hand wanted a stronger government. They believed that having a strong government meant having a strong country, and they thought the Articles of Confederation was doing more harm than good. When the Constitutional Convention of 1787 occurred, the Articles of Confederation was only meant to be changed. It ended up getting thrown out all together and the United States Constitution was created instead. The Anti-Federalists disagreed with this and demanded to have a Bill of Rights, which would protect the citizen's rights. The Federalists thought this wasn't needed, as the states had the powers that the federal government did not. The Anti-Federalists insisted though and believed it was important that they had a proper document protecting their rights.

The Anti-Federalists had more influence while creating the Bill of Rights because they were the ones who pushed for it in the first place. They thought having a document to protect the rights of the citizens was needed, while the Federalists thought it was essentially useless as the states already had all of the powers that the federal government did not hold.

5 0
3 years ago
Help please I don't know who to do this please
Ede4ka [16]
If you ask google or Siri you will find the right answer
7 0
3 years ago
What caused frequent violence to break out in mining camps?
Nataly [62]
Mine workers speak out over a culture of drug use in Fifo camps. One of the cause is Alcohol, male-on-male violence in and around pubs or in the camps, around of shift work at a coal mine - and it's that routine that's causing the problems.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An abundance of food enabled people to pursue jobs outside of agriculture is what
stepladder [879]

An abundance of food enabled people to pursue jobs outside of agriculture is to spend more money on other goods and services like entertainment, leisure etc.

Explanation:

An abundance of food enabled people physically and mentally as they received much amount of nutrition and calorie which enhance their health index. So, they want to spend money in other recreational activities like leisure, tourism, entertainment etc.

Abundance of food also increases people's economic growth. In this condition they do not have any need to struggle for food or excess savings for tough time. So, adequate production fulfill one's expectation and broadens the way of putting more emphasis on goods and other services.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What water use has decreased in Eastern Europe?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the answer ? ASAP
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement BEST describes a difference between a presidential system of democracy and a parliamentary system of democracy?
    6·1 answer
  • Which european country controlled trade in the east indies
    6·1 answer
  • Plz answer fast thanks
    13·2 answers
  • why does the narrator say that rome is an unlikely choice as the location of a major christian church
    8·1 answer
  • Who was the last communist leader of the soviet union before it collapsed?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the name of the alliance established by european communist nations in response to nato?
    9·1 answer
  • MAXIMUM PTS GIVEN.
    10·2 answers
  • In the 1800s, many Americans believed in the policy of Manifest Destiny. What did this mean?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!