Answer:
A. Voters who were college graduates were more likely to support Clinton than Trump.
E. High income voters making over 100k were divided in their support for Clinton and Trump.
Explanation:
edge
The answer is A is just is because it's logic
Answer:
Explanation:
I believe this question comes down to your opinion.
If I were asked though, I would pick democracy. It's pretty easy to explain.
I would pick democracy, because that makes the rulles of the country elected by the people. :)
hope this helped!
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
