1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksenya-84 [330]
3 years ago
5

Freeeeeee points. :).... have a great day!

Law
2 answers:
Bezzdna [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Somebody body once told me the world had it in for me but i aint the smartest tool in the shed!!

Explanation:

Srry had to do that Thanks tho!!!!!!!!!

aleksklad [387]3 years ago
5 0
Thank you so much!! Merry Christmas! (If you celebrate that)
You might be interested in
Describe crimes investigated by forensic anthropologists.
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

Forensic anthropologists analyze human remains, typically in criminal investigations. Their study of human remains aids in the detection of crime by working to assess the age, sex, stature, ancestry and unique features of a skeleton, which may include documenting trauma to the skeleton and its postmortem interval.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
PLS HURRY What countries were allied in World War I and opposed in World War II? Russia and Germany Germany and Britain France a
Dovator [93]

Answer:

The Allies of World War I or Entente Powers were a coalition of countries led by France, the United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, Japan, and the United States against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria, and their colonies during the First World War (1914–1918).

By the end of the first decade of the 20th century, the major European powers were divided between the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance. The Triple Entente was made up of France, Britain, and Russia. The Triple Alliance was originally composed of Germany, Austria–Hungary, and Italy, but Italy remained neutral in 1914. As the war progressed, each coalition added new members. Japan joined the Entente in 1914 and after proclaiming its neutrality at the beginning of the war, Italy also joined the Entente in 1915. The term "Allies" became more widely used than "Entente", although the Principal Allies of France, Britain, Russia, Italy, and Japan were sometimes known also as Quintuple Entente.[1] The colonies administered by the countries that fought for the allies were also part of the Entente Powers such as British India, French Indochina, and Japanese Korea.

The United States joined in 1917 (the same year in which Russia withdrew from the conflict) as an "associated power" rather than an official ally. Other "associated members" included Serbia, Belgium, Montenegro, Asir, Nejd and Hasa, Portugal, Romania, Hejaz, Panama, Cuba, Greece, China, Siam (now Thailand), Brazil, Armenia, Luxembourg, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Haiti, Liberia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Uruguay and Honduras.[2] The treaties signed at the Paris Peace Conference recognised Great Britain, France, Italy, Japan and the United States as 'the Principal Allied and Associated.

3 0
2 years ago
5 of 30
Softa [21]

physical development

7 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between quarantine and isolation?
liberstina [14]

Answer:

Quarantine is goverment mandated. Self-isolation is not required but encouraged.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What are the requirements of a criminal conspiracy? Provide an example of a conspiracy and explain how it meets the definition.
damaskus [11]

Answer:

Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.

Explanation:

Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Rank the three types of deposits that savers make at banks from the "highest return" to "lowest return."
    8·2 answers
  • What was the central issue in the Case of Marbury v. Madison?
    6·1 answer
  • Which early police system had significant influence on current detective work?
    13·1 answer
  • Under United States law, an element of a crime is one of a set of facts that must be what to convict a defendant of a crime
    9·1 answer
  • Write a four-paragraph summary essay analyzing a Supreme Court Ruling that includes a Dissenting Opinion. You may choose to crea
    5·1 answer
  • Quá độ lên chủ nghĩa xã hội bỏ qua tư bản chủ nghĩa.
    10·1 answer
  • A bill that has just been signed into law can still be struck down if
    14·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the community relations (police) officer? Select all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • In criminal trials, the defense calls its witnesses first.<br> True<br> False
    5·2 answers
  • What does 'distributive justice' mean in philosophy?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!