Answer:
a. the evidence presented to the magistrate did not amount to probable cause
Explanation:
Wasnt Enough PC
Answer:
it can lead to admissible evidence in court of law or missed evidence can lead to a guilty person getting away with crime against persons or property.
Answer:
No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.
Considering the available options, the choice that is considered as an innovative criminal defense strategy is "<u>battered women's syndrome."</u>
<h3>What is battered women's syndrome?</h3>
Battered women's syndrome is a medical and psychological term that is used to describe the severe mental health ailment resulting from serious domestic abuse.
Given the legal situation, battered women's syndrome is not a typical condition that is common but has been innovated by some defenders to justify their offense so they can get discharged and acquitted.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>Battered women's syndrome.</u>
Learn more about the criminal defense strategy here: brainly.com/question/11342133
