1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following are elements of causation?a. Actual cause and proximate causeb. Actual cause and significant causec. Actu

al cause and clear caused. Proximate cause and significant causee. Proximate cause and real cause
Law
1 answer:
Art [367]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a. Actual cause and proximate cause

Explanation:

Actual cause is the real cause of an event (i.e accident)  while proximate cause is the reason that the law sees as the cause of the injury from the accident.

You might be interested in
13. About how many teen drivers were killed in motor vehicle crahes in the
irinina [24]

Answer:

An average of nine teens ages 16-19 were killed every day from motor vehicle injuries. 2,739 drivers ages 15-20 were killed and an additional 228,000 were injured in crashes. A total of 4,054 teens between the ages of 13-19 died in car accidents

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the oldest branch of the military?
WINSTONCH [101]
The army
Hope it is correct!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
If you attend a peaceful protest, you are exercising which First Amendment right?
sineoko [7]

Answer: Freedom of speech

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do individual rights have to be balanced against ? Why?<br>20 points​
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

Individual rights are balanced against the individual rights of others, and the rights of everyone as a whole, or the common good, or basically, what benefits everyone. ... The government and courts can also use their power to keep individuals from harming the public as a whole when utilizing their individual rights.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Edna is a leading brain surgeon in the United States. She enters into a contract to perform a complicated brain surgery on Ben.
    15·1 answer
  • Bertha takes her roommate’s credit card with the intent to charge for expenses she will incur on a vacation. Bertha’s first stop
    5·1 answer
  • Picket fence model equals how many correction systems
    12·1 answer
  • What is the main way political parties are able to shape public policy?
    15·1 answer
  • Victims can avoid being at fault for being bullied by:
    5·1 answer
  • Free brainlyest first answer
    8·2 answers
  • Pls hurry i will mark the brainliest has to be right 20 points!!
    5·1 answer
  • After a long school day, Brianna gets on her bike to ride home. She does not have her helmet on because she forgot to bring it w
    6·2 answers
  • During the lunch hour at school a group of five boys from Miss Jones' home room visited a nearby lunch wagon
    13·1 answer
  • Is restorative justice more effective than adversarial justice?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!