There's multiple reasons for the lack of unity between the Indian tribes against the European invasion and expansion on their territory. The Indians were divided into multiple groups, some of which had already had problems and bad blood between them, so alliances between tribes like that were not the first choice in mind. Also, the Europeans played well tactically, by promising some of the tribes certain things if they ally with them, so once the Europeans managed to get what they wanted they were turning against their Indian allies who were pretty much isolated bu that point because of their actions. The conquering of new territories by the Europeans also was very big factor, because they managed to cut the connections between the tribes, thus not allowing them to be able to create alliances and be united against them.
Answer:
Senator Calhoun said California would cause national imbalance, Senator Seward defended antislavery views and Senator Webster was all for Clay's plan. 1850 was to be Daniel Webster's final year in the Senate. A month after Henry Clay's two-day speech on the Compromise of 1850, a mortally ill John C. Calhoun . He designed the first to influence public opinion in favor of compromise to.
Explanation:
I hope this helps
The answer is 3)<span> Great Britain did not have the resources to maintain an empire after World War II
</span>
Even though Britain was able to defeat Germany and the Axis powers in Europe, overall the Empire was in socioeconomic shambles.
The war had resulted in the destruction of hundreds of businesses and factories. London itself was bombarded and the many government officials operated from bunkers.
Millions of men had died and there was a lack of resources.
The government could do things, use the remaining reserves to either rebuild Great Britain or maintain the large Empire. At the end it was decided to give away the Empire and work on rebuilding Britain
<span></span>
While the threat of mutually assured destruction seemed to fade with the end of the Cold War, the threat of "<span>B. the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction"</span> still exists
Answer:
Iran was independent, and Britain controlled trade in southern Iran
Explanation:
A Sphere of Influence is a region where some country or organization has some sort of exclusivity meant to serve the interests of powers outside the borders of the organization or country that controls it. The second and third options don't fit and seem to be more of a colonial situation. The first one doesn't really say anything. The fourth, though, clearly states that there was control over one area by an organization outside the borders. Hope This Helps! Brainliest, Please?
