The correct answer is B) showed that the colonists were prepared.
The outcomes of the battles of Lexington and Concord showed that the colonists were prepared.
On April 1775 the colonist fought against the British troops in the battles of Lexington and Concord. These battles represented the beginning of the Revolutionary War that ended until 1783. The British soldiers marched to Boston but were immediately stopped by Paul Revere and his men. It was an important victory for the colonist that showed that the colonists were prepared for war.
The other options of the question were a) were in favor of the British troops, c) equally favored the British and the Minutemen, and d) showed that the colonists were poorly prepared.
Answer:
I think the three-fifths compromise was a poor attempt to delay the inevitable. I think that it would have been better to address slavery sooner. I think it should have been adressed when the constituion and bill of rights were written. I understand that it would have been a divisive issue but if you claim that "All men are created equal" and then turn around and dehuminaze other people than it makes you a hypocrite becuase you cannot just pick and choose who is and who is not considered human.
The three-fifths compromise did not do anything for the rights of the slaves in fact it dehumanized them even more and caused the civil war to start even sooner. If they had at least counted everyone as a human not only would it have possibly delayed the war but there may have been a way to keep the plantation owerners happy by saying they would have to pay anyone who worked for them and could not abuse them. If the slaves were treated as an entire person then they would have gained the population needed for more representation. It would have also helped them get the freedom they desereved and possibly avoid the civil war. It would have also helped the southern economy to have a higher and eventually more educated population. One cause of the civil war was the signfict difference in the economies in the north versus the south.
Explanation:
Answer:
The north is non-slavery.
Explanation:
The north is non-slavery. Meaning the Northerners would come to the south to help the slaves, obilsously in secret. Think of the Underground Railrod and Herriet Tubman.
<span>The correct answer is A. The US Annexed the Phillippines. They didn't annex it but they did get their support and the Phillippines started working with the United States but there were quarrels and they even had a war at one point. Also, at one point in time, the US did have control over the Phillippines, but it wasn't after the War.</span>
Answer:
The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war's expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American revolution.
