To explain when a person has a moral obligation to disobey the lay. :)
by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
Answer:
negative and positive formidable
Explanation:
Answer:
Teach-back method.
Explanation:
Teach-back method is exemplified as the communication verification method in which the speakers aim to confirm that their intended message is effectively conveyed to the listener. Therefore, such a method
As per the question, 'teach-back' method would assist in improving the understanding as it employs 'show-me' approach to confirm(through consent process) and evaluate the communication skills of the research assistants who are non-English speakers to adjust the explanation method according to the listener's ability to enhance its impact and efficiency. Thus, <u>'teach-back'</u> method is answer.
I think the answer is the reason for his absence is quite simple to understand.
