Answer:
The statement is false.
Explanation:
I actually had this question on a test, and I got it wrong when I put true.
There are all sorts of ways to reconstruct the history of life on Earth. Pinning down when specific events occurred is often tricky, though. For this, biologists depend mainly on dating the rocks in which fossils are found, and by looking at the “molecular clocks” in the DNA of living organisms.
There are problems with each of these methods. The fossil record is like a movie with most of the frames cut out. Because it is so incomplete, it can be difficult to establish exactly when particular evolutionary changes happened.
Modern genetics allows scientists to measure how different species are from each other at a molecular level, and thus to estimate how much time has passed since a single lineage split into different species. Confounding factors rack up for species that are very distantly related, making the earlier dates more uncertain.
These difficulties mean that the dates in the timeline should be taken as approximate. As a general rule, they become more uncertain the further back along the geological timescale we look. Dates that are very uncertain are marked with a question mark.
The nucleus because it is the brain of the cell, it's what controls it.
Answer:
Most scientists believed that heredity material blended together in offspring, however, Mendel did not. he believed that an organism inherits one gene from each parent and that some alleles are dominant over others. This would mean that they would show up in the phenotype of an organism.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Multicellular organisms can be much larger and more complex. This is because the cells of the organism have specialised into many different types of cells such as nerve cells, blood cells, muscle cells all performing different functions.
