Answer:
This question refers to a situation where two team leaders (or co-leaders) were engaged in a romantic relationship. When relationships end, things start to change form being great to the opposite. This eventually led to a decrease in the team's productivity and could eventually result in a harassment lawsuit because Randall refused to let Abbe go and kept insisting on the failed relationship.
Since management didn't care about what was happening (even though Abbe told them), and they only cared about the decrease in productivity; we can conclude that they were engaging in a stability strategy. They were trying to maintain the status quo and turn everything back as it used to be before the relationship started, but things were not that easy.
These are good ways for the service provider to address the intangibility characteristic of services.
When something is intangible, it means it can not be touched. When a customer receives a dog that was well groomed, and happy with the service that can not be passed directly on to another client. The testimonials help a potential customer see what they could get out of the service for their animal, though it can't be "touched".
Answer:
-$7,621
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the net present value of the machine
Using this formula
Net present value of the machine=(Net cash flow *present value of an annuity at 11%)- Amount invested
Let plug in the formula
Net present value of the machine=($2,800+$26000*2.4437)-$78,000
Net present value of the machine=($28,800*2.4437)-78,000
Net present value of the machine=$70,379-$78,000
Net present value of the machine=-$7,621
Therefore the Net present value of the machine is -$7,621
Fascinating Fez is using a cost-focus strategy is False
Explanation:
The business aims to achieve a competitive advantage in its particular market segment through a cost based approach.
In this case, differentiation approach is the technique used by the hat maker. When applying this approach, a organization insists on the supply of differentiated goods, namely exclusive goods of superior quality this differ from rivals.
Cost concentration is on cost savings in specific markets, thus discriminating between different goods that meet the needs of customers in a broad business segment.
Answer:
Refer David to another company.
Explanation:
In the given case, promoting other minority employees is not the correct action because the victim is David. Hiring other African Americans make up for David's loss is not the correct answer either because of the same reason. Paying David's legal costs is not an effort towards compensating for the discrimination. The company is likely required to give David a referral to another company which is the only action that affects David directly in terms of compensation. I hope this was helpful.
